More ESBL exposure through raw or undercooked beef - RIVM

Picture: iStock.

Dutch consumers are exposed to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli bacteria through eating beef more than chicken, according to estimations.

The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) calculated to what degree different types of meat contribute to the exposure of humans to ESBL-producing bacteria.

They found beef was responsible for 78% of total exposure resulting from eating meat. This is due to some beef products being eaten raw such as steak tartare.

More bacteria on chicken

However, ESBL-producing bacteria are found most often on raw chicken meat.

As it is usually cooked before consumption, exposure via this pathway is much lower (18%).

RIVM said people can become exposed as a result of cross contamination in the kitchen, for example by cutting chicken and vegetables with the same knife and/or on the same cutting board.

ESBL is an enzyme produced by bacteria that breaks the structure of certain types of antibiotics (penicillins and cephalosporins).

Bacteria that are capable of producing ESBLs are often commensal intestinal bacteria (Klebsiella, E. coli). The ability to produce the ESBL enzyme does not increase a bacterium's pathogenic capability.

The extent of exposure via meat compared with other routes of infection is unknown and was not investigated in the study.

It is unclear if exposure leads to carriage of the bacteria or potential human health burden.

Calculations take into account various factors that affect the presence of bacteria on meat: pre-processing (heating, salting, drying/fermenting), storage conditions (room temperature, refrigerator, freezer), and method of preparation (raw, thoroughly cooked, half cooked, the degree of cross contamination, etc).

They were made using a risk model, sQMRA (swift Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment).

Health risk?

Data from the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey (Nederlandse Voedselconsumptiepeiling) 2005-2012 was used.

RIVM said there is no evidence that people who eat meat carry more ESBL-producing bacteria in their gut than those who do not.

About 5% of the Dutch population carries ESBL-producing bacteria in the gut.

Examples of other sources of exposure include contacts with animals, between people, other types of food such as raw vegetables and fruit and through the environment.

The study involved literature research and no new laboratory tests were performed.

RIVM recommended follow-up research aimed at estimating the human disease burden caused by ESBL and the relative contribution of food in relation to other transmission routes.

Related News

Broiler chickens in a chicken house on the Bobby Morgan chicken Farm in Luling, Texas Picture: USDA Bob Nichols/Flickr

Imported broiler meat shows increase in ESBL-producing E.coli

Food safety research round-up - Tell us what you are working on!

Research round-up: Food Micro 2016 special

The National Food Institute (DTU Food) is the EU Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance testing quality evaluated

AMR resistance in Salmonella and Campylobacter human isolates

ECDC targets AMR data quality and comparability

©iStock/Sebastian Kauliltzki

ECDC: Molecular surveillance system relies on labs to produce comparable results

STEC was isolated from beef samples but not leafy greens

STEC isolated from 13% of imported beef samples in Sweden

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.