ISO forms committee to create uniform traceability

Picture: iStock

An ISO project committee has been formed to develop a uniform traceability standard.

The ISO/PC 308, Chain of custody committee will simplify traceability in the supply chain by using a uniform ISO language globally.

Knowledge and tracking of product characteristics (e.g. origin, sustainability traits and/or manufacturing process) is increasingly important and demanded by consumers, said ISO.

Traceability and transparency provide reassurance and a better understanding of production characteristics to reduce risks to health, safety and quality, added the standards organization.  

Importance for certification and quality assurance

A reliable chain-of-custody (CoC) management system is important for certification and quality assurance schemes.

The sheer number of CoC systems and programmes adds unnecessary layers of administration, increasing costs and pushing smaller companies out of international markets.

Rob Busink, chair of ISO/PC 308, said the proliferation of traceability systems and definitions is causing unnecessary confusion, complexity and costs for players in different supply chains.

“The proposed generic chain-of-custody standard will define supply chain models and the respective traceability levels and specific requirements related to administration, conversion rates and physical handling activities, thus simplifying market access by using a uniform language and criteria throughout the supply chain," he said.

“It is hoped that existing and new certification schemes will be able to refer to the ISO standard for the terminology regarding chain-of-custody requirements, thus simplifying the conformity assessment for those various product certifications and reducing unnecessary duplication or misunderstanding.”

Organizations and chain-of-custody experts interested in being involved in development of the standard should contact their national ISO member.

FSSC 22000 accepted by NVWA

Meanwhile, FSSC 22000 has been accepted by the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA).

FSSC 22000 said acceptance was a ‘major step forward’ in public-private cooperation and alignment within the Dutch food industry.

Hans Beuger, senior public health officer at NVWA, said three GFSI recognized food safety schemes are available for industry.

“We expect the industry to take action to raise and secure food safety in the supply chain. The next step is to establish a long term public-private cooperation with scheme owners in order to strengthen the supply chain, exchange information where necessary and support official controls.”

After the horsemeat scandal in 2013, it became clear that food safety and integrity had to be better safeguarded.

The Dutch Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport and the Dutch State Secretary of Economic Affairs, with the meat, dairy and animal feed sectors, created a taskforce to restore consumer confidence.

Joseph Scimeca, chair regulatory affairs task force GFSI, said: “The NVWA is blazing the path for other governmental regulatory authorities to recognize the merits of GFSI-benchmarked schemes, the private assurance system and the benefit of utilizing accredited certifications in helping with the deployment of national inspectional resources, which ultimately leads to a strengthening of the food safety system.”

Related News

Increased traceability will improved recall ability (pic: quinet)

Fish industry ISO will improve traceability and recalls - developer

The revised standard is expected by late 2017

ISO 22000 standard revision progressing

Audits and inspections are key issues in the food industry

Transparency and traceability vital in ensuring food safety, says LRQA

Picture: iStock

Food fraud prevention focus for FSSC 22000 version 4

FSSC 22000 is a ISO based food safety certification scheme

Nestlé, Cargill welcome FSSC certificate milestone

Attendees included representatives from The Coca-Cola Company, Wimm-Bill-Dann (PepsiCo) and Santi (ТАТА Global Beverages)

Food safety and quality priorities on agenda at SGS Food Forum

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

Steve Bailey - 21 Feb 2017 | 02:24

CoC

An excellent concept, but I believe more than a concept. Those who use GS1 for identification are getting very close. The question now is how do we get beyond the current one step forward and one step back?

21-Feb-2017 at 14:24 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.